Home Business SC directs maintenance of status quo in RCom’s asset sale to R-Jio

SC directs maintenance of status quo in RCom’s asset sale to R-Jio


(G.N.S) Dt. 22
New Delhi
In a setback to Reliance Communications’ (RCom) asset monetisation plans, the Supreme Court on Thursday directed the company to maintain status quo on plans to sell its wireless assets to Reliance Jio Infocomm (RJio). The court will now hear the case again on April 5.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the Mumbai High Court’s decision to halt the sale of assets until the company receives approvals from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). RCoM and its lenders led by State Bank of India had filed Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) in the Supreme Court against the stay granted by two lower courts on the company’s asset sales.
The top court refused to lift the stay ordered by the arbitral tribunal and set aside the March 8 order of Bombay High Court by which R-Com’s petition was dismissed.
A bench of Justices Adarsh Goel, U U Lalit and R F Nariman said “the parties are at liberty to file any affidavits/written submissions on or before March 28, 2018. In the meanwhile, status quo be maintained by the parties”.
The apex court directed the listing of the matter for final hearing on April 5.
During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for joint lenders forum led by State Bank of IndiaBSE -2.46 %, said they were secured lenders and their claim took precedence over others parties including the unsecured creditors.
He said the value of properties would deteriorate gradually and if the tribunal’s stay was not vacated and the subsequent high court order not set aside, they would be at a loss.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for R-Com, said Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson, which had first approached the tribunal that restrained the sale, was an unsecured operational creditor and much lower in priority of getting the money.
He said the claims of secured financial lenders stood higher on priority as compared to Ericsson and the sale of assets was being undertaken in pursuance of the decisions of the secured financial lenders.
When the bench asked Rohatgi what was the nature of order passed by the tribunal, he replied that it was an injunction order by which sale of assets cannot proceed.
Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, appearing for Ericsson, said if the stay order was vacated, the company would remain remedy-less and may not get its dues back.
The bench said it will hear the matter at length and asked all parties to maintain status quo till further orders.
The State Bank of India had recently moved the apex court challenging a tribunal’s order which was upheld by the high court, allowing Ericsson to stake a claim on R-Com’s consolidated assets.
SBI has said it had total dues worth Rs 4,027 crore against R-Com Consolidated and asserted that unsecured creditor cannot make claims over secured creditors.
Apart from SBI, 24 other Indian lenders constitute the Joint Lenders Fora, which includes BoB, BoI, Canara Bank, Central Bank of India, PNB, IDBI Bank, UCO Bank, IOB, Dena Bank, Corporation Bank, Union Bank, United Bank, LIC and Barclays Bank.
The Anil Ambani led R-Com owes Indian lenders total of Rs 42,000 crore and its consolidated assets include Reliance CommunicationsBSE -5.36 %, Reliance Infratel and Reliance Telecom.
The sale was initiated through a bidding of RCom Consolidated’s assets and Reliance Jio had agreed to buy spectrum, cell towers and other infrastructure, including 1.78 lakh km of fibre optics line for Rs 17,300 crore. R-Com assets’ sale to Reliance Jio was likely to be completed by March 31.
However, Ericsson moved the arbitral tribunal and sought to restrain the sale of RCom Consolidated’s assets on the ground that it had a claim of Rs 1,150 crore on the debt-ridden private telecom firm and would suffer an irretrievable injury.
On March 5, the tribunal gave an order in favour of Ericsson and restrained the sale of R-Com assets. On March 8, the high court dismissed RCom’s appeal against the tribunal order.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here